Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1802 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €25.06 vs €379.64
- Up to 92% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €0.42 vs €5.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 20% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i3-3220 - 72 vs 60 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 24 vs 4 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Buy for €25.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
72
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.27/FPS
7%
Price, €
€379.64
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |