Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i3-3120M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1066 days newer than Core i3-3120M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3120M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than Core i3-3120M - 164 vs 162 FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3120M | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |