Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms Core i3-2377M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 93 days newer than Core i3-2377M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2377M
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 17 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Performs up to 3% better in Minecraft than Core i3-2377M - 596 vs 578 FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
596
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2377M | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |