Key Differences
In short — FX-4100 outperforms Core i3-2377M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4100 is 325 days older than Core i3-2377M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2377M
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 17 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Performs up to 6% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i3-2377M - 90 vs 85 FPS
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
90
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €20.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 284 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2377M | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |