Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Core i3-2367M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 792 days newer than Core i3-2367M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2367M
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 17 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 4% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-2367M - 224 vs 215 FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
224
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2367M | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |