Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i3-2367M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2836 days newer than Core i3-2367M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2367M
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-2367M - 522 vs 498 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
522
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €72.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2367M | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |