Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 575 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 3% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 253 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €203.44 vs €349.99
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 24 vs 8 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €203.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65463 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
245
96.83794466403161%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€349.99
58%
Buy for €349.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65464 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |