Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - €199.5 vs €383.39
- Up to 47% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-9700KF - €1.12 vs €2.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-10320 - 181 vs 178 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.12/FPS
52%
Price, €
€383.39
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €383.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |