Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10300 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10300 is 575 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 10% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 189 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €202.92 vs €349.99
- Up to 47% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €1.07 vs €2.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 24 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€202.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €202.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11782 minutes ago
Buy for €349.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11783 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |