Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 705 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-12900KS - €95.23 vs €458.65
- Up to 77% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-12900KS - €0.18 vs €0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-10300 - 580 vs 539 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 24 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
539
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€95.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €95.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
580
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
22%
Price, €
€458.65
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €458.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |