Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10300 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10300 is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 5% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 88 vs 84 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €106.71 vs €379.64
- Up to 73% better value when playing Hogwarts Legacy than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €1.21 vs €4.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 24 vs 8 threads
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
88
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€106.71
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €106.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |