Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10110U outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10110U is 720 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10110U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10110U - 16 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€183.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €183.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Aug 21st, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10110U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 21st, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |