Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 477 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - €70.56 vs €579.7
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 12% better in FIFA 23 than Core i3-10105F - 183 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €70.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75255 minutes ago
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75255 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1454
85.32863849765259%
Multi-Core
4472
41.810022438294695%
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |