Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 667 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €70.51 vs €690.13
- Up to 88% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i9-13900KS - €0.44 vs €3.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 12% better in Halo Infinite than Core i3-10105F - 181 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
161
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €70.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10648 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.81/FPS
11%
Price, €
€690.13
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €690.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10649 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |