Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 879 days older than the more expensive Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-10105F - 171 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - €16.99 vs €77.56
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for €77.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 271 minutes ago
Buy for €16.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 271 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1454
87.17026378896882%
Multi-Core
4472
56.18090452261306%
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |