Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-4100 - 132 vs 114 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - €20.59 vs €72.14
- Up to 67% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-10105F - €0.18 vs €0.55 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
32%
Price, €
€72.14
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €72.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Buy for €20.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |