Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 879 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - €71.7 vs €702.52
- Up to 90% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-9900X - €0.32 vs €3.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 0% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-10105F - 227 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 20 vs 8 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
226
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.09/FPS
10%
Price, €
€702.52
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €702.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |