Buy on Amazon
€69.58
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4013 days newer than Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-2600K - 135 vs 118 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Intel Celeron G6900 desktop processor 12. Generation (Basistakt: 3.4 GHz, PCIe 5.0 & 4.0 support, DDR5 and DDR4 support) BX80715G6900
Buy for €69.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Core i7-2600K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2600K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
668
41.67186525265128%
Multi-Core
2320
86.05341246290801%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
