Buy on Amazon
€20.16
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 3161 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - €20.16 vs €102.5
- Up to 68% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-10400 - €0.09 vs €0.28 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 65% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G530 - 368 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 12 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
223
60%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G530 CPU verwendet 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 2,4 GHz 2M 65W LGA1155
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i5-10400 Desktop-Prozessor, 6 Kerne, bis zu 4,3 GHz, LGA1200 (Chipsatz der Intel® 400er-Reihe), 65 W
Buy for €102.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
