Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 238 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - €20.16 vs €154.27
- Up to 86% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-3770 - €0.12 vs €0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 6% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G530 - 184 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 8 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
173
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12793 minutes ago
Buy for €154.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12793 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |