Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-6200 is 176 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 53% cheaper than FX-6200 - €20.16 vs €42.6
- Up to 52% better value when playing Battlefield V than FX-6200 - €0.1 vs €0.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G530 - 206 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 6 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 191 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |