Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 826 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3800XT - €60.24 vs €424.03
- Up to 81% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 7 3800XT - €0.41 vs €2.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 36% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G4900 - 198 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
146
73%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19537 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
198
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.14/FPS
19%
Price, €
€424.03
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €424.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19537 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |