Buy on Amazon
€74.68
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $278
Availability
MSRP in USD: $278
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 1710 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 35 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 3% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G3930T - 175 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Intel Core i7-3770 Quad-Core Prozessor (3,4 GHz, 4 Core LGA 1155, BX80637I73770)
Buy for €74.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 269 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
81.66915052160954%
Multi-Core
948
41.23531970421922%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Celeron G3930T or Core i7-3770
Dota 2, 1920 x 1080, Best Looking
89 FPS
€8.73/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050
Core i7-3770
8 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€777
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
