Buy on Amazon
€75.65
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $129
Availability
MSRP in USD: $129
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 205 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G3930T - 126 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
LANCHY AMD Ryzen 3 1300X CPU verwendet 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,5 GHz 8M 65W Sockel AM4
Buy for €75.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
49.95442114858706%
Multi-Core
948
30.028508077288564%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
