Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €20.54 vs €93.65
- Up to 77% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Core i5-10400F - €0.15 vs €0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G3930T - 145 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
140
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
145
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
23%
Price, €
€93.65
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €93.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |