Buy on Amazon
€20.54
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $182
Availability
MSRP in USD: $182
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 551 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - €20.54 vs €86.23
- Up to 73% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i5-6400 - €0.14 vs €0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 17% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G3930T - 168 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
143
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.54
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930T 2,7 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 35 W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €20.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-6400 2,7GHz Boxed CPU
Buy for €86.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i5-6400
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
