Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 1602 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 4% better in Rust than Athlon 3000G - 182 vs 175 FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74562 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
86.13861386138613%
Multi-Core
1975
65.33245120740986%
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |