Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1929 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Metro Exodus than Core i7-3770 - 143 vs 140 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - €102.0 vs €154.27
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 24 vs 8 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €154.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65814 minutes ago
Buy for €102 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65815 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
671
57.15502555366269%
Multi-Core
2299
32.955848623853214%
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |