Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1600 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - €35.49 vs €224.14
- Up to 84% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 5 2600X - €0.21 vs €1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G1820 - 175 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
166
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
175
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
16%
Price, €
€224.14
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €224.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |