Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 2662 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - €35.49 vs €226.95
- Up to 67% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i7-11700F - €0.49 vs €1.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 107% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G1820 - 151 vs 73 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
73
48%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 523 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
151
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.5/FPS
32%
Price, €
€226.95
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €226.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 524 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |