Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - €35.49 vs €249.9
- Up to 85% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-10700KF - €0.24 vs €1.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1820 - 161 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
149
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.55/FPS
15%
Price, €
€249.9
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €249.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |