Buy on Amazon
€66.63
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-965 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-965 is 944 days older than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 17 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Celeron 847 - 253 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 8 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
253
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.63
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core I7-965 I7 965 3,2 GHz Gebrauchter Quad-Core-CPU-Prozessor 130W 8M LGA 1366
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 525 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 130 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
