Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3470 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3470 is 348 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 17 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Performs up to 78% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Celeron 847 - 57 vs 32 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 4 vs 2 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
57
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €72.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18637 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |