Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2300X outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2300X is 2640 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2300X - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 2300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2300X
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron 847 - 215 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 4 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Ryzen 3 2300X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2300X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
