Buy on Amazon
€72.67
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $184
Availability
MSRP in USD: $184
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3470 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-965 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3470 is 1292 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Performs up to 3% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i7-965 - 62 vs 60 FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 77 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i5-3470 - €66.63 vs €72.67
- Up to 5% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i5-3470 - €1.11 vs €1.17 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 8 vs 4 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Intel Core i5-3470 Prozessor (3,2GHz, Sockel 1155, 6MB Cache, 77 Watt)
Buy for €72.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12828 minutes ago
Intel Core I7-965 I7 965 3,2 GHz Gebrauchter Quad-Core-CPU-Prozessor 130W 8M LGA 1366
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12828 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Core i5-3470
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
