Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 730 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 15 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron 2955U - 150 vs 147 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |