Key Differences
In short — Core i7-940 outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-940 is 1749 days older than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 15 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-940 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Performs up to 1% better in Death Stranding than Celeron 2955U - 213 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 8 vs 2 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
213
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | Intel Core i7-940 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |