Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3636 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Dishonored 2 than Celeron 1000M - 272 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 16 vs 2 threads
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
272
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €148.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |