Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2846 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 51% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron 1000M - 258 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 32 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
258
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1021.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,021.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |