Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 3922 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 39% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron 1000M - 158 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 32 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€494.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €494.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |