Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2977 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 71% better in Far Cry 6 than Celeron 1000M - 147 vs 86 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 12 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
147
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €154.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11278 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |