Buy on Amazon
€102.5
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2657 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Celeron 1000M - 122 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 12 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€102.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-10400 Desktop-Prozessor, 6 Kerne, bis zu 4,3 GHz, LGA1200 (Chipsatz der Intel® 400er-Reihe), 65 W
Buy for €102.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i5-10400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
