Buy on Amazon
€52.11
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 954 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 3% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron 1000M - 227 vs 220 FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€52.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2,80GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €52.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
