Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500K outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2500K is 742 days older than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron 1000M - 171 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €43.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |