Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1554 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €399.99 vs €560.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing Stray than Core i9-13900F - €2.19 vs €2.96 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 189 vs 183 FPS
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
183
96%
Value, €/FPS
€2.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€399.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11453 minutes ago
Buy for €560 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11452 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |