Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1314 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 15% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 194 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €208.45 vs €379.64
- Up to 52% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €1.07 vs €2.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
169
87%
Value, €/FPS
€2.25/FPS
47%
Price, €
€379.64
54%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€208.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €208.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |