Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 1700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 161 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Far Cry 5 than Ryzen 7 1700 - 203 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €290.43 vs €379.64
- Up to 21% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €1.47 vs €1.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.87/FPS
78%
Price, €
€379.64
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
198
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€290.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |