Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 912 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 2% better in War Thunder than Celeron G6900 - 195 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 49% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - €66.9 vs €131.73
- Up to 49% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen 7 3700X - €0.35 vs €0.68 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
51.470588235294116%
Price, €
€131.73
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €131.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60408 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
192
98.46153846153847%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60407 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
96.91656590084644%
Multi-Core
2696
33.275734386571216%
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |