Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 675 days older than Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 3400G - 170 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 16 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
169
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Picasso | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |