Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 730 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 40% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G3900 - 144 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
103
71.52777777777779%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57392 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
49.74315068493151%
Multi-Core
992
17.12115982050397%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |